Which is the least ideal Synchronization Status for Security Management Server High Availability deployment?

In a Security Management Server High Availability deployment, having a status of "Collision" is the least ideal condition. This status indicates that changes have been made to both the primary and secondary servers without synchronization, resulting in conflicting configurations. Such collisions make it difficult to determine which changes should take precedence, potentially leading to inconsistency in policy enforcement and increased risk of security gaps.

An ideal synchronization status would ensure that both servers have the same configurations and can operate seamlessly together. Other statuses like "Synchronized" indicate that both servers have the exact same settings, while "Lagging" means the secondary server has not yet caught up to the primary but is expected to do so shortly. "Never been synchronized" suggests that the two servers have not yet established a synchronization relationship, but it does not imply the operational risks associated with conflicts that arise during a collision. Therefore, "Collision" represents the most problematic state in a High Availability setup, as it can directly impact the reliability and security of the deployment.